Assertion and Assent of Integralism

DI recognizes that all representative government is structurally wrong because it is centered upon man instead of centered upon God. Those who question our zealotry in wanting a God centered government must question themselves in supporting a man-centered government. Some have indeed become stagnant, losing hope for anything better. If a similar course was taken by man earlier we would still have Feudalism as an economic system. We recognize, however, that history is a forward moving process and does not necessarily repeat itself.

Why should we believe that a system founded in taverns 200 years ago is relevant or even meaningful for the present? Those who argue that it is moral argue the part that it was made in taverns. Likewise, they do not understand that the Enlightenment philosophers who envisioned it were heathenish proponents of Christianity and unquestionably immoral. Representative government should however be should judged by its effects on the present. Namely, that we live in the most immoral time ever. And for that Democracy can burn in hell. Likewise, we should question not only Marxism but also Capitalism. Morality must be asserted in the market just as in every aspect of life. Economic Darwinism is of the devil. The market does not evolve to higher and higher heights through man-centered means. Selfishness is not a Christian value. On the other hand it is obvious man is not created equal. Proletarians should submit to the bourgeoisie as slaves to their master. Masters should treat their servants as brothers in Christ. Those who disagree with this can not mention one Christian economy which has not worked. I can however mention one that did work mainly of the early Christian Church. Finally, the holding of debts for eternity must be disallowed. There will be a Jubilee every 7 years and 1 on the 50th year . If this means the end of people living beyond their means because no credit agency is going to issue any long-term debt, so be it. People will have to learn to save.

Some ask the question "who decides what is right?" as if there is no absolute truth that can be determined objectively. Our answer is that we wish to create a knowledge-centered government made of experts. We do this by reducing government to a science. Each position is something earned by the best of citizens. One can see this is better than a democratic popularity-contest of emotional rhetoric determined by the beliefs of the average citizenry. Those who wish to argue with us as being too idealistic, are reducing people to be motivated by only pure self-interest from which they say corruption will take place. Although this might be true of the majorities this is not true of the minority whose hope it is to see the systematic dissolution of secularism, materialism, and lavishness which has downgraded our culture. One should clearly see that it is a fallacy to extend the fallen-nature philosophy on the mature Christian. How else are we the salt of the Earth unless we take an pristine role in society?

Our movement is not so radical as it is authentic for we know that with absolute confidence that we are correct. How can we say this? Because too many children have been systematically murdered through abortion, perversion and vulgarity has been protected and proliferated too long under free speech, and our children have been doused too long under a deviant education system of liberal lies. 40 years of conservative activism has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt as people are fallen-natured there is no democratic solution to our moral decline. DI does not wish to compromise our message by putting it to a vote. We hold the Bible as absolute truth and believe that it is a sufficient moral guide to replace the Constitution now and forever. Furthermore, we are not of the belief that all interpretations of it are equal but elevate traditional interpretations. Furthermore, we do not give credulousness to the flimsy opinion of the masses just as a professor would not to a Wikipedia article. We are fundamentally religious and totalitarian in that we seek the restructuring of every organization to Christian precepts to the extent that each aspect of one's life will be centered around religious doctrine. We simultaneously call for the elevation of unity and systematic convergence of all Christian persuasions. We will accomplish this by insuring that every child from grade school will be well versed in Biblical languages, hermeneutics, apologetics, and theology.

We hereby call all non-Christian beliefs as immoral and heretical. We do not sympathize with these as much as we do not sympathize with those tenaciously holding to the view that the Earth is flat. Anyone who disagrees with Christianity is a promulgator of lies and deception. We look toward the future to systematically refute these views and then eliminate all heresy from print and speech. If we save one soul from damnation because of this we can say our action is justified in systematically purging all heretical literature. If one asks how we plan to do this a possibility includes insuring all literature is pinned to a State approved database. Likewise, we do not hesitate with using search and seizures. Over the years all heretical and seditious literature will become rarer and rarer for we know it is typically the same people who perpetuate these things. Many will accuse us of being insensitive to people's personal views, but, in actuality, we wish to save them from their personal views by showing them what is correct.

It is not our wish to nail down every view a person could possibly have about the Bible and etc... some things are up to debate and will be for years to come. Heresy, however, is easy to define and is much more than a wrong teaching or a set of wrong teaching in that it disagrees with the core of perfect truth found in the Bible. We do believe that truth will become clearer and clearer as our education system becomes more and more comprehensive. It will take time before we are able to nail down every wrong doctrine. It will be done, just probably not within the lifetime of anyone reading this.

What will we do next one might ask? Well, we will make sure the Christian viewpoint will have a monopoly in literature, media, and, as said previously, education. All this will be under a Christian government. We will systematically alter all media and literature to not only have pure words and images but also to reflect a Christian message. We will not shrink from altering even the English language to promoting a Christian conception. We will even impose a dress-code on all men, women, and children to encourage purity and decency. It is our promise to delete any web-page, television program, or radio program that is not uplifting from the memory of mankind-forever. In such an interconnected world where information travels so quickly our goal can be no other than be global. We do not ask for the consent of the governed it is our faith that truth must be asserted, absolutely and supremely.