DI seeks to create a collective masterpiece through motivation, specialization, reconciliation, and actualization of each unique entity in one collaborative infrastructure. By concentrating on strengths and providing a tailor-fit education, DI uses each individual to maximum efficiency. This principle is founded upon the paradigm that someones weakness is another person's strength. DI wishes to bring structure to the panorama of individual diversity. The goal of this is to insure the flow of knowledge from different area of expertise to another via. generalists while promoting further research/design via specialists.
DI cares not only about peoples actions but peoples attitudes. DI insures motivation by individual attitude adjustment (IAA). It is the goal of DI that each person is motivated. DI does this actively by offering performance-based rewards and punishments. The object of which will be to insure the correct attribution of value in the person's mind about each particular subject at hand. DI will also do it passively by manipulation of each persons environment and minimization of privacy to achieve the regulation of all communication. Lastly, it will insure motivation through the learning process by the institutionalization of DI philosophy. The measuring rod of whether this works will be personal interviews and simultaneous lie detector testing. Attitude readjustment must be a will-breaking process which might include temporary individual isolation from all outside influences until treatment. DI recognizes the person under the influence of wrong thinking as a captive needing liberation. It recognizes that indoctrination in which right-thinking is inserted might be a necessary means to this goal. That being said motivation boils down to thinking correctly.
Once each individual is thinking correctly, it is important that each be assigned specific roles to which they will serve the community the best. Vertical movement in their role will be determined by qualification and merit. Roles are not seen as static but as an evolving, liquid, and dynamic spider-web of interactions and reciprocity. The goal is not individual happiness but efficiency. DI does not insure happiness by individual choice but rather by the mastering of the individual. Individuals that are unhappy with their life-skills are given attitude readjustment therapy. Roles, however, will be assigned by using the life-long learning process to learn about each individual. Feedback will be encouraged so as to identify any flaws in the system and to learn how to better sell DI ideology to the populace. The State will reply to each comment in an efficient manner so as to address every concern and hence reduce any uncertainty and ambiguity. That being said not only is the government highly involved, but each individual should be highly involved in the well-being of society. Roles exist to provide direction. Roles are the abdication of personal planning for collective planning of each individuals lives. The direction the roles provide goes hand in hand with motivation. It is the duty of the people to not only be satisfied in their roles but motivated. A personal and total government is necessary not only for the selection of goals but the ongoing maintenance of them.
The next logical step from being emphatic with one's place is being emphatic about the place of others in the power-structure. D.I. encourages not only the reconciliation of each entity, classes, and subcultures but the integration of each under a corporate identity. DI does this by insuring transparency between all entities to minimize distrust. DI then insures accountability by insuring information is quickly carried at the top to insure a simultaneous quick response time. DI also insures cross-communication via generalists between all social structures and furthermore creating projects that will encourage collaboration between different entities. The result of which encourages a steady outgrowth of new disciplines of studies and social structures. Telecommunications and monitoring technologies will be developed to aid in these ends. The overall goal is the binding of social structures and individuals into one conglomerate whole.
The final result will be social actualization. Society can be envisioned like a clock individuals are the gears. Social Actualization comes at the abdication of each individual to the collective self. The final realization is that we all exist for society and society for God. Collectivization comes when serving becomes the sole identity of each. This is in other words the death of the self-centered perspective to the emerging other centered perspective. DI wants everyone to see the world through the lens of the perfected world-view, to insure collaboration, maximum efficiency, and sustainability. Actualization can only be achieved by putting the collective will in agreement with the will of God. Actualization is the ascension of that will which can only be achieved through God's grace.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment